« »
December 19th, 2020

Unitization Agreement Oil And Gas

As a general rule, a unit agreement contains provisions on what happens if the division of units is changed. For example, the unit agreement may provide that any change in the division of units requires the unanimous agreement of the parties, except in the case of the declaration of dissemination or revocation, termination or expiry of licenses. The merger agreement will generally (among other things) include the importance of recognizing that the merger is a joint enterprise agreement between joint ventures that existed before the single agreement came into force. These existing joint ventures are either the result of production-sharing contracts or state-granted licences, so the single agreement is based on a number of agreements that form the basis of the single agreement. The superior nature of the single agreement on previous agreements may undermine the interests and obligations of the parties under previous agreements, which may pose difficulties for co-managers in fulfilling their obligations under their previous agreements to the state or to third parties. One of the most important nuances of the pre-unit agreement that the parties must be aware of is that the interests of the parties contained in the merger agreement will not necessarily be reflected in the subsequent unity agreement. This is because the parties will learn more about the reservoir through geological studies and reservoir engineering that will be conducted following the conclusion of the single agreement, and then as soon as one or more new provisions are implemented (see below). Given the importance of the new provisions and in order to ensure the integrity of the process, letters of commitment to the expert may provide a guarantee that the expert has not conducted a study on the relevant area for one of the parties to the single agreement before a certain period of time and that the expert has no conflict of interest with the parties. The exchange of data between licensing groups can be problematic, as licensing groups strive to preserve the confidentiality of their own data acquired in connection with their license. In practice, negotiating a confidentiality agreement between licensing groups can be a lengthy process, especially when the parties do not agree with the specific purpose of using confidential data and then request the collection of data that does not fall within the scope of the confidentiality agreement protecting the confidentiality of the data already exchanged. a number of possible bases for redefinition, including (a) “hydrocarbons that are present at first” (HIIP) – which refers to hydrocarbons in situ at the time of uniqueness (and which is the simplest and most frequent basis for redefinition); and (ii) “estimated ultimate recovery,” which refers to the amount of hydrocarbons that can be produced; and the agreement defines the process that the parties must follow as soon as it is agreed that a redefinition should take place. A typical example is the following process: the unit agreement aims to create the unit of the two or more licensing or contract areas containing the tank by the association of the respective interests of the licensees and to provide for the development, operation and closure of the unit.

Comments are closed.